
Películas de Dave Franco: Filmografía completa y dónde verlas
with class …” So it’s required. The raw article doesn’t have it. We need to wrap the content inside
. That’s a structural repair. We’ll do that.
Also check: intro paragraph is present and correct. Section snapshot-block: present with 4 cards? Yes, it has 4 cards with card-num 1-4. Stats line: present after intro. Key facts table: present (the table with data clave). H2s per contract: need to check if all required H2s from contract are present. The contract’s question_driven_structure lists H2s: “¿Cuáles son todas las películas de Dave Franco?”, “¿Qué películas de Dave Franco están disponibles en Netflix?”, “¿Qué películas tienen a Dave Franco y James Franco juntos?”, “¿Cuáles son las películas de comedia de Dave Franco?”, “¿Qué papel interpretó Dave Franco en Nerve?”. The raw article has these H2s? Let’s see:
– “¿Cuáles son todas las películas de Dave Franco?” – yes.
– “¿Qué películas de Dave Franco están disponibles en Netflix?” – yes.
– “¿Qué películas tienen a Dave Franco y James Franco juntos?” – yes.
– “¿Cuáles son las películas de comedia de Dave Franco?” – yes.
– “¿Qué papel interpretó Dave Franco en Nerve?” – yes.
All present. Also there is an H2 “Filmografía completa (2007–presente)”? That’s an H3? Actually it’s an H3 under the first H2. That’s fine.
Blockquotes: need 2-4 blockquotes from ≥2 speakers. The article has two blockquotes: one from Rotten Tomatoes consensus, one from IFC Films. That’s two speakers, good. But we need at least 2, so okay.
FAQ: need ≥5
So structure integrity: we need to add the n24-wrap div. Also ensure stats line is present: it’s there.
Gate 2: Contract coverage. Must cover questions from contract. Already covered. But check verbatim wording? The contract says “Where question_source=’paa'” should be verbatim. The H2s appear to be verbatim from the contract’s top questions. Good.
Gate 3: Claim = source. Every
Also check other list items in snapshot: Card 1 has sources, good. Card 3 has sources. Card 2 has no list items with sources? It has one list item: “No hay conflictos significativos…” which doesn’t need a source. That’s fine.
So for Card 4, replace the list item with: “Dave Franco debutó como director con The Rental (2020)” and add source anchor to IFC Films. That is a verified fact from research notes (source_tier1). That will satisfy.
Now Gate 4: Fact lock vs verified_facts. The research notes have verified_facts (JSON) empty. So no changes.
Gate 5: FAQ dedup. Need to ensure no >85% overlap with H2/H3. Check FAQ items: They are about first movie, awards, TV, production, next projects, cameo. None duplicate H2s. The H2s are about full filmography, Netflix, James Franco, comedy, Nerve. The FAQ items are different. So no dedup needed. Min 5, we have 6, okay.
Gate 6: Link hygiene + diversity. Internal links: The raw article has two internal links at the end in “Lectura relacionada”. They are internal (eldiariocentral.net). They have href and anchor text. Need to strip target/rel? The gate says “Internal (site domain or /): strip target/rel.” So we remove target=”_blank” and rel from those internal links. Also ensure no duplication. External links: many links to IMDb, IFC Films. Each external URL at most once. Check: IMDb links are to different IMDb pages, each unique. IFC Films link appears twice? In the article, there is a link to IFC in the tip and in a blockquote. Both are to the same URL? Actually one is in the tip: “IFC Films (distribuidora independiente)” and another in the blockquote: “IFC Films (distribuidora independiente)”. That’s the same URL. That violates “each external URL at most once”. We need to remove one or combine. Also another IFC link in the intro? No. So we need to deduplicate. Also ensure all external links have target=”_blank” rel=”noopener nofollow”. The raw article already has that. So we just need to remove the duplicate external link. We can remove the second occurrence, e.g., in the blockquote we can leave the citation without link? But the blockquote citation includes a link. The gate says strip duplicates. We can change the second occurrence to just text without link, or link to a different source. The research notes have only one IFC Films source. We’ll change the blockquote citation to just “IFC Films” without hyperlink, or use a different source if possible. The blockquote is from IFC Films press release. We can keep the link only in the first occurrence (the tip) and remove the hyperlink from the blockquote citation. That’s acceptable.
Also external link diversity: max 3 per domain. IMDb appears many times, but each is a different path (different IMDb pages). That counts as same domain. We have many IMDb links. The gate says “Max 3 per domain”. That means we cannot have more than 3 links to the same domain. The raw article has many IMDb links (9+). That’s a problem. We need to reduce to max 3 IMDb links. But we can keep the most important ones and remove others, or change to other sources. The research notes include IMDb as tier2. We can replace some IMDb links with alternative sources from research notes. Research notes also include IFC Films, Sony Pictures, Universal Pictures. We can use those. Also we can use Wikipedia? Not in research notes but it’s a common source. The research notes don’t include Wikipedia. But we can add Wikipedia as a source? The article currently uses IMDb for many claims. To comply, we need to reduce IMDb links to at most 3. Let’s count: in the snapshot card 1, there are 3 IMDb links. That’s already 3. Then in card 3, there is another IMDb link (for Superbad). That would be 4. Also in the filmography table text, there is an IMDb link in the paragraph after the table: “( callouts (one “Por qué importa”, one “La paradoja”). Good.
– no more than 2 consecutive
without break: check. The article has sections with multiple paragraphs. We need to ensure no more than 2 consecutive
without a list/table/callout/quote. There’s a section after the filmography table:
El dato clave…
La implicación…
That’s two consecutive
. Then there is a
El dato clave…
then
Filmografía completa
then
El listado anterior…
Then
Películas principales
then
- So not consecutive. After the FAQ, there is